In India there are multiple statues dealing with Intellectual property enforcement and issues. India also follows common law principals in dealing with IP issues. The statutes dealing with Intellectual Property matters in India are:
1. Trademarks Act, 1999 and Rules there under
2. Copyright Act, 1957 and Rules there under
3. Patents Act, 1970 as amended by Patents (Amendments) Act, 2005 and Rules there under
4. Designs Act, 2000 and Rules there under
8. Geographical Indication of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act, 1999 and Rules there under
9. Semiconductor, Integrated Circuit Layout Design Act, 2000 and Rules there under
10. Plants Varieties Protection and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2000 and Rules there under
11. Information Technology Act, 2000 and Rules there under
12. Customs Act, 1962 and Rules there under
Besides the above, India also follows common law for protection of Intellectual property rights.
Patent Infringement:
Patent infringement proceedings can only be initiated after Grant of patent in India but it may include claim retrospectively from the date of publication of Patent in Indian Patent Journal subject to law of limitation. Under the Limitation law does not allow action/suits in respect of matter where cause of action had arisen more than three years from the date of suit.
Acts constituting infringement of Patent Rights: -
• Making
• Using
• Selling
• Distributing
• Importing
• Offering any of the above
All persons or incorporations directly or indirectly involved in any of the above stages may be held liable for infringement.
Appropriate forum:
A suit for infringement has to be filed in a District court or High court (depending upon pecuniary jurisdiction) within whose territorial jurisdiction the cause of action has arisen. However, as soon as a counter claim for revocation of patent is filed against the suit for infringement of patent, only high court has the jurisdiction of entertain the matter and the matter has to be transferred to High Court for decision.
Burden of proof
The onus of establishing the infringement is on the plaintiff. However, in case of patent involving a process for obtaining a product where the plaintiff first establishes that the products obtained are identical, the court may shift onus on the defendant.
Interim Injunction:
The Court may also allow interim injunction against the infringer.
Defences to Infringement of Patent in India
The following defences are available in India as a defence in Patent Infringement:
1. Any of the grounds under which Patent can be revoked
2. By govt of India or for Govt. of India for its own use
3. Experiment or research
4. Imparting instructions to pupils
5. For Patent in respect of Medicine or drug, for its own use of Govt. of India, for distribution in Govt. Dispensary and hospitals or by gazette notifications to other dispensaries, hospitals and medical institutions.
Enforcement of Trademark Rights
Under Indian Laws statutory protections is available to both registered marks as well as unregistered marks. In respect of trademarks Indian law provides both civil as well as criminal remedies for taking action against any infringement of a trademark.
Appropriate forum:
A suit for infringement of trademark has to be filed in a District court or High court (depending upon pecuniary jurisdiction) within whose territorial jurisdiction the cause of action has arisen.
Before Trademark Registry- Administrative Remedy
1. Opposition (before the Registrar)- Opposition can only be done after publication of the trademark and within 3 months of date of availability of Journal. One month extension is available if sought before the expiry of 3 months time.
2. Cancellation (before the Registrar as well as Appellate Board)- Cancellation on the ground of non-use for a period of 5 years and 3 months and proof of intention on part of the registered proprietor not to use the trademark at the filing date and non-use till the cancellation petition.
Before Courts- Civil Remedy
Under common laws, the proprietor of a trade mark, whether registered or unregistered, may sue for passing off in respect of any trade mark used by defendant that is identical with or deceptively similar to his trade mark. The registered proprietor also has the remedy to take infringement action.
1. Injunction- Ex parte/ permanent
2. Damages
3. Anton Pillar Order,
4. Seizure of goods
5. Rendition of accounts
Before Courts- Criminal Remedy
Besides Civil remedies, the proprietor of the trademark as well as licensed users also have the option to initiate criminal prosecution against the infringers etc. Following acts have been recognised as offences, against which a criminal complaint can be registered:-
• Falsifying a Trade Mark;
• Falsely applying a Trade Mark;
• Making or possessing instruments for falsifying a Trade Mark;
• Applying false trade description;
• Applying false indication of country of origin;
• Tampering with an indication of origin already applied to goods;
• Selling goods or possessing or exposing for sale of goods falsely marked;
• Falsely representing a trade mark as registered;
• Improperly describing a place of business as connected with the Trade Marks Office;
• Falsification of entries in the Register.
Procedure and punishment
The complaint for any of the above offences can be made/filed before the Magistrate within whose territorial jurisdiction the offence is committed.
Besides confiscation of goods and machinery, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 also provides for imprisonment starting from 6 months to 3 years for the offences or fine or both.
Confiscation of imported goods bearing counterfeit marks
Indian Customs Act, 1962 provides for confiscation of imported goods bearing counterfeit marks if upon a representation made to Chief Customs Officer, he has reasons to believe that the alleged goods bear a false/ counterfeit Trade Mark. The Chief Customs Officer may require the importer of the goods or his agent to produce any documents in their possession relating to said goods along with informations as to the name and address of Consignor as well as importer of said goods and may initiate proper action for non compliance or offence.
Trans-border Reputation
Trans-border reputation of trademarks is well recognised and accepted in India even if said mark is not registered in India.
Enforcement of Copyright
India is a member of the Berne Convention and TRIPS, therefore owner of copyright from another member country will get same copyright protection in India. However, the duration of copyright shall not exceed the original duration in the member country.
Infringement of copyright
Copyright in a work is deemed to be infringed when any person, without a license granted by the owner of the copyright does anything, the exclusive right to do which is by the Act conferred upon the owner of the copyright.
Acts Constituting Infringement of copyright
The following acts if done or authorised to be done by someone else, without consent or permission of the copyright owner, are considered as infringement of copyright:
i) Reproducing the work in any material form;
ii) Issuing copies of the work to the public not being copies already in circulation;
iii) Including the work in any cinematographic film;
iv) Making an adaptation of the work ;
v) Doing any of the acts specified at (i) to (iii) above in relation to adaptation of work
vi) Communicating the work to the public, if aware that such act shall amount to infringement of copyright
vii) Making, selling, letting on hire, distributing, importing or holding trade exhibits in public of infringed work.
Appropriate forum:
A suit for infringement of copyright has to be filed in a District court or High court (depending upon pecuniary jurisdiction) within whose territorial jurisdiction the cause of action has arisen.
Test to determine infringement
One of the surest test to determine whether or not there has been a violation of copyright is to see if the trader, spectator, or the viewer after having read or seen both the works would be clearly of the opinion and get an unmistakable impression that the subsequent work appears to be a copy of the first.
Before Copyright Registry- Administrative Remedy
Registrar of Copyright has the power to ban import of infringing copies into India and delivery of infringing copies of copyright work confiscated earlier from infringer to the owner of the copyright on an application made by the owner of copyright or his duly authorized agent.
Before Courts- Civil Remedy
The owner of the copyright has the following remedies against infringement:
1. Injunction- Ex parte/ permanent
2. Damages
3. Anton Pillar Order
4. Seizure of goods
5. Rendition of accounts
Before Courts- Criminal Remedy
Copyright Infringement is a cognizable offence (non-bailable offence) the offence of infringement of copyright is punishable with imprisonment, which may extend from a minimum punishment of 6 months to maximum of 3 years and with a fine not less than fifty thousand rupees and extending upto two lakh rupees. For the second and subsequent conviction the minimum term of imprisonment is increased to minimum one year and minimum fine is one lakh rupees.
Enforcement of copyright in Designs
Appropriate forum:
A suit for piracy of design has to be filed in a District court within whose territorial jurisdiction the cause of action has arisen. However, as soon as any ground as to cancellation of design is taken in said suit or any other proceedings, only high court has the jurisdiction of entertain the matter and the matter has to be transferred to High Court for decision.
Piracy of Design
Following acts without consent or license from the registered proprietor amount to piracy of registered design:
1. Apply or cause of apply to any article in any class in which design is registered, the design or fraudulent or obvious intimation thereof for sale;
2. Import any article in any class in which design is registered, the design or fraudulent or obvious intimation thereof;
3. Knowingly publish or expose or cause of publish or expose for sale an article in any class in which design is registered where design or fraudulent or obvious intimation thereof has been applied.
Damages towards piracy of design
For any piracy of registered design the defendant has to pay sum up to Rs. 25,000 towards the contravention. However maximum damages allowed are Rs. 50,000 in respect of a single design.
Injunction for design right violation
Besides awarding the damages the proprietor may also seek injunction against repetition of contravention.
Defences to piracy of design in India
The defences available for defence in piracy of design is are any of the grounds under which design can be cancelled.
- Patent and Trademark Attorneys INDIA, NEPAL, BHUTAN, SRI LANKA, PAKISTAN, MALDIVES, BANGLADESH
Search This Blog
Saturday, July 23, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Use of registered marks on the Google Ads Program as keywords amounts to trademark infringement and constitutes passing-off: Delhi High Court
In the matter of Makemytrip India Private Limited vs Booking.com B. V. & Ors. , vide its order dated 27th April 2022, Justice Pratibh...
Labels
- 1897
- 1997
- 2002
- 2007
- 2016
- 38(4)
- 38(5) of the Trademark Rules
- A composite suit for infringement of a registered design and a passing off action would not lie
- Acquiescence
- Advantage of Madrid filing in India
- Advantages of Madrid system
- advertising Law
- Advertising Law in India
- Advertising law India
- Advertising Lawyer
- alcohol advertising
- Amendment in claims
- America Invents Act
- appeal against trademark rectification
- Apple
- Aswal Associates
- Aswal Assocites
- Beta Form of Imatinib Myselate
- biotech patens in India
- Biotech patent in India
- Biotech patents in India
- Biotech patents India
- Booking.com judgement
- BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS
- Byond tech
- child advertising India
- Cognizable Offence
- Coke
- Coke Studio
- cokestudio.in
- Commissioner of Customs
- Compulsary license for patents
- compulsary license in copyright
- computer software patent
- Computer software patent in India
- Computer software patents
- Controller General of Patents
- Copyrigh litigation
- copyright board
- Copyright compulsary license
- Copyright in India
- Copyright Law Practice India
- copyright registration india
- Copyright Rules 2013
- criminal prosecution under Trademark infringment
- defence to trademark infringement
- Delhi High Court
- Delhi High Court Full Bench
- Design (Amendment) Rules 2014 Notified
- Design cancellation
- Design filing requirements India
- Design India
- Design Infringement
- Design infringment
- Design Passing Off
- Design Patent Practice India
- Design renewal India
- Dhodha House
- disadvantage of madrid filing in India
- divisional application
- DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE OR WAIVER FOR INFRINGEMENT
- domain dispute
- Draft Patent Amendment Rules 2010
- Draft Patent Amendment Rules 2011
- Draft Patent Amendment Rules 2013
- Dual Sim Patent
- EMR
- Ericsson
- Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. AIR 2004 SC 1682
- Examination of Trademark Application
- Exclusive Marketing Rights
- Expedited examination in India
- Exphar SA
- Expose Loot in the name of Commonwealth Games Misplaced priorities
- Extension of deadline to file Opposition
- fair description of goods
- fair use of marks
- false complaint of trademark infringment
- fee changes under copyright rules 2013
- fee for copyright filing
- fees for Patent design Taiwan Patent
- Filing International Trademark Application from India
- filing of PCT national phase Applications in India
- FIR Registration
- First of file
- First to Invent
- Form 24
- FRAND
- Full Bench Delhi High Court
- General clauses Act
- Generic Pharma Companies
- Glaverbel S.A. vs Dave Rose Ors.
- Glivec
- Google Ads Program judgement
- google advertisement judgement
- Govt fee for trademark filing in India
- GSK
- H.R. 1249
- Imatinib
- Imatinib Myselate
- Increase in patent fee
- Increased fee for Patents in India
- India joins Madrid Protocol
- India Patent
- India Patents
- Indian Copyright law
- Indian Copyright practice
- Indian Design law
- Indian Industrial Design Law
- Indian Patent
- Indian Patent Law
- Indian Patent Office
- Indian Patents Act
- Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. vs. Sanjay Dalia
- Indian trademark Law and Practice.
- Indian trademarks law
- Industrial Design law and Practice India
- Infringement of trademark
- Infringement under Section 62 of Copyright
- Intellectual Property Enforcement in India
- interlocutory Application
- International Preliminary Examining Authority
- International Trademark filing
- Interpretation of Indian Patents Act
- ip news
- IPEA
- IPRS
- IRDI
- ISA
- Justice A. K. Pathak
- Keyword judgement
- Laches
- Lalita Kumari Vs. State of UP & Ors.
- latest from Indian Patent office
- Law for advertising in India. Advertising India Law
- license for patents India
- loss of goodwill for false complaint
- Madrid filing in India
- Madrid Protection in India: Advantages and Disadvantages
- MADRID PROTOCOL
- Madrid Registration designating India
- Makeymytrip judgement
- Man Machine
- marketing approval for generic drugs
- MBD
- Metatag Judgement
- Micormax
- Mighty Mouse
- misery to people
- Mohan Goldwater Breweries Ltd
- monstrous corruption
- national phase entry in India
- New Amendments in Design Law India
- New Amendments in Trademark law in India
- New Patent Amendment Rules 2014 have increased the fee
- Nothing FAIR In FRAND (Ericsson- Micromax Patent Litigation)
- Notice of Provisional Refusal
- Notice of Provisional Refusal by Indian Trade marks Registry
- Novartis AG
- novartis Patent
- Novartis Patent India
- nternational Searching Authority
- Opposition agaist registered tradmarks
- Opposition opputunity
- packaging and labelling law india
- packaging and labelling requirements in india
- Passing off action can be instituted in case of Registered Design
- Passing off of Registered Design
- Patent
- Patent (Amendment) Rules
- Patent (Amendment) Rules 2011
- Patent Agent India
- Patent Amendment Rules 2019
- Patent amendments in India
- Patent Appeals
- Patent Attorney India
- Patent fee in India
- Patent filing in Asia
- Patent filing in India
- Patent filing in thailand
- Patent filing India
- Patent filing requirements
- Patent firm india
- Patent in India
- Patent India
- Patent infringement
- Patent Infringement and counter claims
- Patent infringment
- Patent law firm india
- Patent Law In India
- Patent law India
- Patent law India. Patent in India
- Patent law India. Patent India
- patent licensing India
- Patent Litigation
- Patent No. 190380
- Patent Novartis
- Patent novartis India
- patent of addition
- Patent office
- Patent Office India
- Patent Opposition
- Patent pharma
- PATENT PROSECUTION DETAILS MADE PUBLIC
- Patent Rights
- Patent Rules 2014
- Patent services
- Patented Drugs
- Patents filing India
- Patents in India
- Patents India
- PCT filing in India
- PCT filing India
- PCT filing requirements
- pct member countries in Asia
- PCT national phase application
- pct national phase application in India
- PCT national phase Applications in India
- PCT national phase filing
- PCT to cover 144 countries
- permanent injunction rendition of accounts damages
- Pernod Ricard India Private Ltd
- Peter Scot case
- PH Kurian IAS
- pharma patent India
- pharma patents India
- Post Grant Opposition
- Pre Grant Opposition
- prerequisite for Madrid filing
- Previous Registrant of Design can file Infringement suit against subsequent Registrant
- previous registration in foreign country not ground of cancellation in India
- principles of waiver and acquiescence under indian trademark law
- Prior publication of Design
- Procedure for hearing
- Property Right (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules
- Proposed amendments of PCT Regulations
- Publishing on website is not a communication
- Ram Kumar
- reasonable renumeration for compulsary license
- Recent amendments in Trademark Rules India
- Rectification of trademark
- Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154
- Registration of notice for suspension of clearance of imported infringed goods
- response to provisional refusal
- restoration after expiry
- revised fee for taiwan patent design
- Rule 38
- Rules 66 67 68 of Trademarks
- Rwanda and Qatar became PCT Contracting states
- SAB Group
- Samsung
- Sanjay Kaul
- Section 116 117A 117G Patents Act
- Section 134 of Trademarks Act
- Section 151 CPC
- Section 25 25(3) 25(4) 26 of Trademarks Act
- Sections 57 and 58 of the Patents Act
- small entity status
- software business method patents in India
- software patent India
- software patents in India
- software patents India
- South African Breweries International (Finance) B.V.
- standards and weight and measures packaged commodities rules
- Starr Ups
- Sudhir Kumar
- Sugar Free
- Suggestions to Draft Patent Amendment Rules 2013
- Supreme Court gave liberty to approch appropriate High Court to the whistle blower who challanged appointment of NABARD Chairman
- Supreme Court on infringement
- Supreme Court on patent
- surrogate advertising for alcohol
- Taiwan Patent Office
- Territorial Jurisdiction Trademark Infringement
- test of confusion and deception
- thailand patent law
- The Coca Cola Company
- The intellectual property rights (imported goods) enforcements rules 2007
- Trade dress
- trade mark India
- trade marks India
- Trademark (Amendment) Bill-2009
- Trademark Amendment Rules 2014
- Trademark Amendment Rules 2017
- Trademark amendments India
- Trademark Attorney India
- Trademark cases India
- Trademark Dispute
- Trademark fee in India
- Trademark filing in India
- trademark filing India
- Trademark filing requirements
- Trademark Hearing
- trademark in India
- Trademark India
- trademark infringment India
- Trademark Law in India
- Trademark law india
- trademark lawyers India
- Trademark litigation
- Trademark Opposition
- Trademark Oppostion infringment examination prosecution renewal India
- Trademark passing office
- Trademark prosecution India
- Trademark Registation in Myanmar; Myanmar Trademark Law; Intellectual Property Office (IPO) of Myanmar
- Trademark renewal after expiry
- Trademark restoration
- Trademark Rules 2014
- Trademarks
- trademarks in India
- Trademarks India
- Tradmark litigation India
- United Volunteers Association
- USPTO
- UVA
- Waiver of rights
- Well known mark declaration process
- whats new under copyright rules 2013
- WIPO
- www.cokestudio.in
- Zimmermann Patent for Imatinib
There are two factors that deals with intellectual property. First, there are expenditures associated with determining sailing companies and monitoring whereas the second thing deals with the efficiency of the enforcement effort.
ReplyDelete