Skip to main content

China Trademark Law 2026 Revision: Key Changes Every Brand Owner Must Know

Introduction China has completed the most consequential rewrite of its Trademark Law in over a decade. On June 26, 2026, the 23rd Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Fourteenth National People's Congress adopted a comprehensive revision of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China — the fifth amendment since the law was first enacted in 1982, and the first substantive overhaul since the narrow 2019 revision. The revised law, comprising 87 articles across nine chapters (up from 73 articles in eight chapters under the outgoing law), will enter into force on January 1, 2027. Trademarks registered before that date remain valid. For brand owners, in-house counsel, and IP practitioners with China exposure, this is not a routine update. The revision touches registration standards, opposition timelines, well-known mark protection, damages calculations, and — perhaps most significantly — the treatment of bad-faith and speculative filings that have long troubled foreig...

Myanmar's New Trademark Law: A Shift Toward a Modern Registration System

On January 30, 2019, the Parliament of Myanmar passed the country's first modern Trademark Law, marking a significant step toward aligning Myanmar's intellectual property regime with international standards. This legislation will replace the existing practice—under which trademark rights are secured merely by registering a Declaration of Ownership with the Office of the Registration of Deeds—with a formal, examination-based trademark registration system.

To administer this new regime, Myanmar will establish an Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") under the Ministry of Commerce.

Transition for Existing Registrations

Recognizing that numerous trademarks are already on record under the old declaration-based system, the IPO will introduce a "soft-opening" period, commencing in January 2020, during which owners of existing registrations may re-file their marks with the IPO. This re-filing window will remain open for six (6) months, and re-filed marks will be accorded priority on a first-to-file basis.

Filing of Fresh Applications

New trademark applications under the formal system will only be accepted once the soft-opening period concludes—tentatively expected to be July 1, 2020.

Until that date, brand owners retain the option of securing rights under the existing declaration-based system. Accordingly, businesses may still file new applications under the current Deed of Declaration system up to December 31, 2019, and subsequently re-file the same marks with the IPO on or after January 1, 2020, thereby preserving priority under the first-to-file principle once the new system takes effect.

Examination Process

All applications filed with the IPO will be subject to both formality and substantive examination. The specific documentary requirements and official fee structure are yet to be finalized and will be announced in due course.

Comments

  1. While looking, attempt changed blends of your name. For instance, in the event that you are scanning for AMAZON, search for AMASON, HAMAZON, or comparable word designs. Attempt a few unique blends of words and spellings. Reach vakilsearch to Trademark Search

    ReplyDelete
  2. The company owner secures exclusive control to the use of the trademark when it comes to joint registration of the trademark. Get registered: certification mark

    ReplyDelete
  3. Trademark Registration in Jaipur as it provides protection to the business name and legal right to the owner of the business. Trademark registration also provide you the right to receive the remedies to the owner of the trademark.

    Trademark registration in Jaipur
    GST registration in jaipur
    food license Registration in Jaipur

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the update. Anyone who is interested in filing trademark click here: Trademark filing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024: What the New Flexibility Gives You — and the Hard Deadlines It Cannot Touch

Introduction On 15 March 2024, the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024 came into force and quietly rewrote the rhythm of patent prosecution in India. Practitioners who had spent two decades telling clients "this deadline cannot be extended, full stop" suddenly found themselves revising standard advice: many timelines that were once immovable can now be bought back, at a price, under the liberalised Rule 138. But here lies the trap — and it is a trap that has already caught applicants who read the headlines and not the fine print. The 2024 amendments are subordinate legislation made under Section 159 of the Patents Act, 1970. They can soften only those timelines that live in the Rules . Where the Act itself fixes a period and attaches a consequence — "deemed abandoned," "deemed withdrawn," "shall not be entertained" — no Rule, however generously worded, can rescue a defaulting applicant. Only Parliament can. This article does two things. First, it wal...

Use of registered marks on the Google Ads Program as keywords amounts to trademark infringement and constitutes passing-off: Delhi High Court

  In the matter of  Makemytrip India Private Limited vs Booking.com B. V. & Ors. , vide its order dated 27th April 2022, Justice Pratibha M. Singh of Delhi High Court granted injunction in favour of Make My Trip (hereinafter “MMT”. MMT had filed the suit seeking protection of its registered trademarks 'MakeMyTrip' and its variants used by Booking.com B.V. as keywords on the Google Ads Program for promoting its services as advertisements when search results are displayed on the Google search engine . The contention of MMT was that when a search is carried out for 'MakeMyTrip' in the Google search bar, quite often the first advertisement which is displayed in the search results in the advertisement category is that of Booking.com, who is one of the major competitors of MMT. According to MMT, such use of its registered mark would constitute infringement, especially when done by its competitor such as booking.com.   Booking.com relied on the judgment of the E...