Skip to main content

Trap Purchases and Manufactured Jurisdiction in Indian IP Litigation

  Trap Purchases and Manufactured Jurisdiction in Indian IP Litigation A study of SML Ltd. v. M/s Happy Agro Chemicals and the doctrine of trap transactions Introduction In intellectual property disputes, few procedural issues matter as much as deciding where a case can be filed. The choice of court often shapes the entire journey of the case — from how quickly interim orders are granted, to the attitude of the local lawyers, to the practical burden placed on a defendant who must fight far from home. Because the forum is so important, plaintiffs sometimes try to influence it. The most common method is the trap purchase : a test buy arranged by the plaintiff, where an investigator pretends to be a regular customer, purchases the allegedly infringing product, and keeps the invoice and packaging. Later, this evidence is used not only to show infringement but — more controversially — to argue that the cause of action arose within the territory of the chosen court. Tra...

Myanmar's New Trademark Law: A Shift Toward a Modern Registration System

On January 30, 2019, the Parliament of Myanmar passed the country's first modern Trademark Law, marking a significant step toward aligning Myanmar's intellectual property regime with international standards. This legislation will replace the existing practice—under which trademark rights are secured merely by registering a Declaration of Ownership with the Office of the Registration of Deeds—with a formal, examination-based trademark registration system.

To administer this new regime, Myanmar will establish an Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") under the Ministry of Commerce.

Transition for Existing Registrations

Recognizing that numerous trademarks are already on record under the old declaration-based system, the IPO will introduce a "soft-opening" period, commencing in January 2020, during which owners of existing registrations may re-file their marks with the IPO. This re-filing window will remain open for six (6) months, and re-filed marks will be accorded priority on a first-to-file basis.

Filing of Fresh Applications

New trademark applications under the formal system will only be accepted once the soft-opening period concludes—tentatively expected to be July 1, 2020.

Until that date, brand owners retain the option of securing rights under the existing declaration-based system. Accordingly, businesses may still file new applications under the current Deed of Declaration system up to December 31, 2019, and subsequently re-file the same marks with the IPO on or after January 1, 2020, thereby preserving priority under the first-to-file principle once the new system takes effect.

Examination Process

All applications filed with the IPO will be subject to both formality and substantive examination. The specific documentary requirements and official fee structure are yet to be finalized and will be announced in due course.

Comments

  1. While looking, attempt changed blends of your name. For instance, in the event that you are scanning for AMAZON, search for AMASON, HAMAZON, or comparable word designs. Attempt a few unique blends of words and spellings. Reach vakilsearch to Trademark Search

    ReplyDelete
  2. The company owner secures exclusive control to the use of the trademark when it comes to joint registration of the trademark. Get registered: certification mark

    ReplyDelete
  3. Trademark Registration in Jaipur as it provides protection to the business name and legal right to the owner of the business. Trademark registration also provide you the right to receive the remedies to the owner of the trademark.

    Trademark registration in Jaipur
    GST registration in jaipur
    food license Registration in Jaipur

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the update. Anyone who is interested in filing trademark click here: Trademark filing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024: What the New Flexibility Gives You — and the Hard Deadlines It Cannot Touch

Introduction On 15 March 2024, the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024 came into force and quietly rewrote the rhythm of patent prosecution in India. Practitioners who had spent two decades telling clients "this deadline cannot be extended, full stop" suddenly found themselves revising standard advice: many timelines that were once immovable can now be bought back, at a price, under the liberalised Rule 138. But here lies the trap — and it is a trap that has already caught applicants who read the headlines and not the fine print. The 2024 amendments are subordinate legislation made under Section 159 of the Patents Act, 1970. They can soften only those timelines that live in the Rules . Where the Act itself fixes a period and attaches a consequence — "deemed abandoned," "deemed withdrawn," "shall not be entertained" — no Rule, however generously worded, can rescue a defaulting applicant. Only Parliament can. This article does two things. First, it wal...

Keyword Advertising and Trademark Infringement: MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. v. Booking.com B.V. & Ors.

Background By order dated April 27, 2022, Justice Pratibha M. Singh of the Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of MakeMyTrip India Private Limited ("MMT") in its suit against Booking.com B.V. and others. MMT had sued to protect its registered trademarks "MakeMyTrip" and its variants, which Booking.com was using as keywords on Google's Ads Program to trigger its own advertisements in Google search results. MMT's grievance was that a search for "MakeMyTrip" frequently displayed, as the very first result in the advertisement category, a sponsored listing for Booking.com — one of MMT's principal competitors. MMT argued that such use of its registered mark by a direct competitor amounted to trademark infringement. Booking.com's Defense Booking.com resisted the injunction on several grounds: It relied on the European Commission's decision in Case AT.40428 — Guess , dated December 17, 2018 (the " Guess decision"...