Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label Patent Restoration

Trap Purchases and Manufactured Jurisdiction in Indian IP Litigation

  Trap Purchases and Manufactured Jurisdiction in Indian IP Litigation A study of SML Ltd. v. M/s Happy Agro Chemicals and the doctrine of trap transactions Introduction In intellectual property disputes, few procedural issues matter as much as deciding where a case can be filed. The choice of court often shapes the entire journey of the case — from how quickly interim orders are granted, to the attitude of the local lawyers, to the practical burden placed on a defendant who must fight far from home. Because the forum is so important, plaintiffs sometimes try to influence it. The most common method is the trap purchase : a test buy arranged by the plaintiff, where an investigator pretends to be a regular customer, purchases the allegedly infringing product, and keeps the invoice and packaging. Later, this evidence is used not only to show infringement but — more controversially — to argue that the cause of action arose within the territory of the chosen court. Tra...

Delhi High Court Restores Synertec's Patent Application: Patent Agent's Docketing Error Does Not Cost the Applicant Its Rights

Summary In re:   Synertec Pty Ltd v. Union of India & Anr., W.P.(C)-IPD 53/2025, the Delhi High Court has restored Indian Patent Application No. 202217030233, filed by Australian company Synertec Pty Ltd for a system and method of vaporising liquefied natural gas, after the application had gone "deemed to be withdrawn" under Section 11B(4) of the Patents Act, 1970 for non-filing of the Request for Examination (Form 18) within the statutory 48-month window. The Court held that the lapse was caused entirely by the Petitioner's patent agent misstating the deadline, not by any intention on Synertec's part to abandon the invention, and directed the Patent Office to restore the application and permit Form 18 to be filed within two weeks. Background: How the Application Came to Be "Deemed Withdrawn" Under Section 11B read with Rule 24B of the Patents Rules, 2003, an applicant must file a Request for Examination within 48 months of the priority date, faili...