Skip to main content

Critical Analysis: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. v. Controller of Patents

  Critical Analysis: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. v. Controller of Patents (2026:DHC:5394) C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 24/2023 | Delhi High Court | Decided: 06.07.2026 I. Doctrinal Analysis: Novelty and the "Coverage vs. Disclosure" Question A. The genus-species anticipation problem The core novelty dispute was a classic Markush-genus-versus-species-selection issue. The appellant argued that arriving at the claimed species from the generic Formula I of D1/D7 required " multiple selections " among independent variables (R1–R6), and that the Controller impermissibly relied on more than one prior art document to construct a single "closest prior art" novelty attack — a submission with real doctrinal pedigree, since novelty (unlike obviousness) is ordinarily tested against a single prior document read as a whole. The Court's response — invoking AstraZeneca AB and Boehringer Ingelheim v. Vee Excel — collapses the " covered vs. disclosed " dist...
Post a Comment

About the Firm

Aswal Associates: Two Decades of Protecting Innovation Across Borders

Intellectual Property Excellence · Est. 2004 · New Delhi, India

In a world where ideas travel faster than ever, protecting them requires a partner who understands both the science behind an invention and the strategy behind a business. Since 2004, Aswal Associates has been that partner — a premier intellectual property law firm headquartered in New Delhi, delivering comprehensive patent, trademark, and copyright services across India, South East Asia, ASEAN, the United States, and Europe.

Strategic IP Counsel for Global Markets

Founded by Managing Partner Sudhir Kumar, Aswal Associates has grown from a specialised patent and trademark prosecution practice into one of India’s leading full-service IP firms. Our work spans the complete spectrum of intellectual property rights — patent prosecution, trademark registration, copyright protection, complex IP litigation, and cross-border licensing.

We serve a remarkably diverse client base: individual inventors taking their first idea to market, ambitious startups scaling globally, and multinational corporations managing portfolios across dozens of jurisdictions. Our sector experience runs deep in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, information technology, telecommunications, and manufacturing.

Over more than two decades, this commitment to technical precision, strategic clarity, and a client-first approach has earned the firm recognition in the IAM Strategy 300 — the global guide to the world’s leading IP strategists.

Why Clients Choose Aswal Associates

1. Technical Excellence

IP law is only as strong as the technical understanding behind it. Our team includes attorneys with advanced degrees in engineering, life sciences, and chemistry — enabling us to grasp complex innovations across pharmaceutical, biotech, mechanical, and software domains. The result: patent claims drafted to withstand both prosecution and litigation.

2. Global Reach

Through a trusted network of associate firms, we deliver seamless IP protection across India, the ASEAN region (Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines), the USA, China, and Europe. One firm, one coordinated strategy, every jurisdiction.

3. Strategic Counsel

We go well beyond filings. Our services include portfolio management, freedom-to-operate analyses, IP due diligence for mergers and acquisitions, and monetization strategies aligned with your commercial objectives. We believe IP is a business asset — and we help you leverage it as one.

4. Client-First Approach

Every relationship we build rests on transparency, responsiveness, and trust. Whether you are a solo inventor or a Fortune 500 company, our approach is tailored to your circumstances — and our team responds within 24 business hours.

Our Journey: Two Decades of Excellence

2004 — Firm Founded. Aswal Associates is established in New Delhi by Sudhir Kumar, specialising in patent and trademark prosecution before the Indian Patent Office and Trade Marks Registry.

2008 — South Asia Practice. The firm expands to cover South Asian jurisdictions including Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan, offering comprehensive regional IP coverage.

2010 — International Expansion. An associate network is established across ASEAN and beyond, enabling coordinated patent and trademark filings in Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, South Korea, Japan, China, the US, Europe, the UK, and South Africa.

2015 — IAM Strategy 300 Recognition. Managing Partner Sudhir Kumar is recognised in the IAM Strategy 300, reaffirming the firm’s position at the forefront of global IP practice.

2024 — 20 Years of Practice. Aswal Associates celebrates two decades of dedicated IP counsel with a team of 12+ specialists, 1,000+ patents filed, and 5,000+ trademarks registered across more than 50 countries.

Recognised by the IP Community

  • IAM Strategy 300 — Recognised among the world’s leading IP strategists
  • INTA — Member, International Trademark Association
  • APAA — Member, Asian Patent Attorneys Association
  • Bar Council of Delhi — Enrolled member

Partner With Us

Innovation deserves protection that is as sophisticated as the idea itself. Whether you are filing your first patent, building a global trademark portfolio, or navigating cross-border IP disputes, Aswal Associates brings the technical depth, international reach, and strategic insight to safeguard what you create.

Get in touch with our New Delhi office to discuss how we can protect and grow your intellectual property.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024: What the New Flexibility Gives You — and the Hard Deadlines It Cannot Touch

Introduction On 15 March 2024, the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2024 came into force and quietly rewrote the rhythm of patent prosecution in India. Practitioners who had spent two decades telling clients "this deadline cannot be extended, full stop" suddenly found themselves revising standard advice: many timelines that were once immovable can now be bought back, at a price, under the liberalised Rule 138. But here lies the trap — and it is a trap that has already caught applicants who read the headlines and not the fine print. The 2024 amendments are subordinate legislation made under Section 159 of the Patents Act, 1970. They can soften only those timelines that live in the Rules . Where the Act itself fixes a period and attaches a consequence — "deemed abandoned," "deemed withdrawn," "shall not be entertained" — no Rule, however generously worded, can rescue a defaulting applicant. Only Parliament can. This article does two things. First, it wal...
Post a Comment
Read more

Keyword Advertising and Trademark Infringement: MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. v. Booking.com B.V. & Ors.

Background By order dated April 27, 2022, Justice Pratibha M. Singh of the Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of MakeMyTrip India Private Limited ("MMT") in its suit against Booking.com B.V. and others. MMT had sued to protect its registered trademarks "MakeMyTrip" and its variants, which Booking.com was using as keywords on Google's Ads Program to trigger its own advertisements in Google search results. MMT's grievance was that a search for "MakeMyTrip" frequently displayed, as the very first result in the advertisement category, a sponsored listing for Booking.com — one of MMT's principal competitors. MMT argued that such use of its registered mark by a direct competitor amounted to trademark infringement. Booking.com's Defense Booking.com resisted the injunction on several grounds: It relied on the European Commission's decision in Case AT.40428 — Guess , dated December 17, 2018 (the " Guess decision"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Myanmar's New Trademark Law: A Shift Toward a Modern Registration System

On January 30, 2019, the Parliament of Myanmar passed the country's first modern Trademark Law, marking a significant step toward aligning Myanmar's intellectual property regime with international standards. This legislation will replace the existing practice—under which trademark rights are secured merely by registering a Declaration of Ownership with the Office of the Registration of Deeds—with a formal, examination-based trademark registration system. To administer this new regime, Myanmar will establish an Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") under the Ministry of Commerce. Transition for Existing Registrations Recognizing that numerous trademarks are already on record under the old declaration-based system, the IPO will introduce a "soft-opening" period, commencing in January 2020, during which owners of existing registrations may re-file their marks with the IPO. This re-filing window will remain open for six (6) months, and re-filed marks will be a...
5 comments
Read more